8,078
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
:Yeah, I don't really have a preference. I guess I've used whatever the current tenants use in their own materials. [[Palafox Place]] (which I think only runs from Garden to Main, then it's back to Palafox Street) could be more useful as a link if we redirect it to a section specifically about that strip, i.e. [[Palafox Street#Palafox Place]], which would include stuff about the two-way vs. one-way traffic, etc. <span style="font-family:Georgia, serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''''[[User:Admin|admin]]''''' • '''''[[User_talk:Admin|talk]]''''' </span> 15:54, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
::You're right about the length of "Palafox Place". I'm not going to cry about it either way. Palafox Place is a superficial designation invented by the City. FDOT, the Escambia County Property Appraiser, and various other sources still consider it just "South Palafox Street". Maybe I should just lobby to get it changed back, and that'll settle the question. LOL. Either way, I guess we don't really ''have'' to establish a standard, we can use both, maybe with a note under [[Palafox Street]] regarding the two names. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; vertical-align:5%; font-family: Georgia,serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' • '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' </span> 20:16, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
==Length of Palafox==
Right now we have Palafox terminating northerly just north of Brent Lane, where it splits into [[Pensacola Boulevard]] (US 29) and what many call "Old Palafox" (CR 95A). However, for much of "Old Palafox" the actual designation, and the street signs read, "Palafox Street".
So -- when talking about "Old Palafox", should we call it by that name, and hence put it in a separate article, or call it Palafox Street, and add it to this one? <span style="font-variant:small-caps; vertical-align:5%; font-family: Georgia,serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' • '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' </span> 15:12, 24 January 2009 (UTC)