The section listing 2008-2009 changes is mostly unnecessary. An encyclopedia should not contain a list of what teachers taught what classes. What's your reasoning, Seth? Frome 20:18, 28 June 2009 (CDT)
- I agree, it's getting into way too much minutiae for my liking. — dscosson • talk 08:07, 29 June 2009 (CDT)
- That's cool. I'll take it out. It was mostly relevant leading up into and during the beginning of the 2008-2009 school year so that others would be aware of the changes instead of having a whole bunch of questions, if that makes sense. I'll take it out right now. Sethisodd 21:41, 5 July 2009 (CDT)