Difference between revisions of "Talk:Belmont-DeVilliers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I know the official name of the street is "De Villiers," but I've had a hard time finding any source that doesn't call the neighborhood "Belmont-'''Devilliers'''" (including the [http://pe...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I know the official name of the street is "De Villiers," but I've had a hard time finding any source that doesn't call the neighborhood "Belmont-'''Devilliers'''" (including the [http://pensacolacitygov.com/live/pages.asp?pageID=2065 City website]). Any thoughts? How do we reconcile two prominent-but-different spellings? --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 00:14, 30 April 2007 (CDT) | I know the official name of the street is "De Villiers," but I've had a hard time finding any source that doesn't call the neighborhood "Belmont-'''Devilliers'''" (including the [http://pensacolacitygov.com/live/pages.asp?pageID=2065 City website]). Any thoughts? How do we reconcile two prominent-but-different spellings? --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 00:14, 30 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | *I noticed. My personal feeling is that we maintain correctness and have "Belmont-Devilliers" redirect to the current page, as is already so. I see a lot of sources that say "Belmont-DeVilliers", almost as if they are recognising that de Villiers is not one word but squishing it together anyway. I think the current presentation is most correct, but I'm not going to make a fuss if it bothers you. '''[[User:Dcosson|dcosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 07:48, 30 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:48, 30 April 2007
I know the official name of the street is "De Villiers," but I've had a hard time finding any source that doesn't call the neighborhood "Belmont-Devilliers" (including the City website). Any thoughts? How do we reconcile two prominent-but-different spellings? --Admin 00:14, 30 April 2007 (CDT)
- I noticed. My personal feeling is that we maintain correctness and have "Belmont-Devilliers" redirect to the current page, as is already so. I see a lot of sources that say "Belmont-DeVilliers", almost as if they are recognising that de Villiers is not one word but squishing it together anyway. I think the current presentation is most correct, but I'm not going to make a fuss if it bothers you. dcosson ··· talk 07:48, 30 April 2007 (CDT)
