Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tannenheim"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Incidentally, I was at the estate auction in 2002 and took loads of pictures of the building, both exterior and interior. Does that raise any privacy concerns, or are the pictures fair gam...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Incidentally, I was at the estate auction in 2002 and took loads of pictures of the building, both exterior and interior. Does that raise any privacy concerns, or are the pictures fair game because the house was vacant at the time? --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 17:16, 8 July 2008 (CDT) | Incidentally, I was at the estate auction in 2002 and took loads of pictures of the building, both exterior and interior. Does that raise any privacy concerns, or are the pictures fair game because the house was vacant at the time? --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 17:16, 8 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::Hmm. I would say the exterior shots are fair game. As for the interior, I'd want to know more information... maybe we could find out if anyone is occupying the house at the present? If so I'd want to pursue their blessing. But... If no one is actively occupying the house still presently, I don't think there are any legal or ethical concerns, really. '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 20:44, 8 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:44, 9 July 2008
Incidentally, I was at the estate auction in 2002 and took loads of pictures of the building, both exterior and interior. Does that raise any privacy concerns, or are the pictures fair game because the house was vacant at the time? --Admin 17:16, 8 July 2008 (CDT)
- Hmm. I would say the exterior shots are fair game. As for the interior, I'd want to know more information... maybe we could find out if anyone is occupying the house at the present? If so I'd want to pursue their blessing. But... If no one is actively occupying the house still presently, I don't think there are any legal or ethical concerns, really. dscosson ··· talk 20:44, 8 July 2008 (CDT)
