Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Elections by year"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: What would you think of grouping elections by decade instead of by year? --~~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What would you think of grouping elections by decade instead of by year? --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 12:38, 4 May 2008 (CDT) | What would you think of grouping elections by decade instead of by year? --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 12:38, 4 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | :Any particular reason? I kind-of like it by year, as it will be really easy to see all election articles for a given year (3-4 articles) once I have done more of them. But then again, I guess it wouldn't be that much harder to sort them out of the 12-15 that would be in a decade-based category. Whatever you want to do, I don't feel strongly about it. '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 13:14, 4 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:14, 4 May 2008
What would you think of grouping elections by decade instead of by year? --Admin 12:38, 4 May 2008 (CDT)
- Any particular reason? I kind-of like it by year, as it will be really easy to see all election articles for a given year (3-4 articles) once I have done more of them. But then again, I guess it wouldn't be that much harder to sort them out of the 12-15 that would be in a decade-based category. Whatever you want to do, I don't feel strongly about it. dscosson ··· talk 13:14, 4 May 2008 (CDT)
