Difference between revisions of "Pensapedia talk:Notability"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I presume that pages for local teachers would not be suited for Pensapedia unless they received a notable award (since that goes under the category of "prominent in their fields"? [[User:Sethisodd|Sethisodd]] 20:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC) | I presume that pages for local teachers would not be suited for Pensapedia unless they received a notable award (since that goes under the category of "prominent in their fields"? [[User:Sethisodd|Sethisodd]] 20:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Correct. They'd have to be notable for something else. <span style="font-family:Georgia, serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''''[[User:Admin|admin]]''''' • '''''[[User_talk:Admin|talk]]''''' </span> 20:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:37, 7 March 2009
What do you think about Joshua A. Jones? Almost certainly vanity. Notable? dscosson ··· talk 15:28, 13 April 2008 (CDT)
- Does seem like a vanity page, but at least it's fairly objective. If he is a professor and does provide pro bono representation to the groups listed, it might be "notable enough." Let me email Susan Watson if she can verify. --Admin 16:15, 13 April 2008 (CDT)
I presume that pages for local teachers would not be suited for Pensapedia unless they received a notable award (since that goes under the category of "prominent in their fields"? Sethisodd 20:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
