Difference between revisions of "Pensapedia talk:Source namespace"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: What do you think of using Category:Source documents (or some subcategory thereof) on all pages in the Source namespace? ~~~~) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What do you think of using [[:Category:Source documents]] (or some subcategory thereof) on all pages in the Source namespace? <span style="font-family:Georgia, serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''''[[User:Admin|admin]]''''' • '''''[[User_talk:Admin|talk]]''''' </span> 13:18, 18 September 2009 (CDT) | What do you think of using [[:Category:Source documents]] (or some subcategory thereof) on all pages in the Source namespace? <span style="font-family:Georgia, serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''''[[User:Admin|admin]]''''' • '''''[[User_talk:Admin|talk]]''''' </span> 13:18, 18 September 2009 (CDT) | ||
| + | :I would even prefer sub-categories, like [[:Category:City of Pensacola ordinances]], [[:Category:British West Florida source documents]] etc. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; vertical-align:5%; font-family: Georgia,serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' • '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' </span> 14:41, 18 September 2009 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::Right, definitely. But just as a main depository to hold all the other subcategories, does "Category:Source documents" work? <span style="font-family:Georgia, serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''''[[User:Admin|admin]]''''' • '''''[[User_talk:Admin|talk]]''''' </span> 15:57, 18 September 2009 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::Oh yeah, for sure. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; vertical-align:5%; font-family: Georgia,serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' • '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' </span> 10:19, 19 September 2009 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Formatting== | ||
| + | On the ordinances and resolutions I have transcribed thus far, I have employed a monospace font in an effort to duplicate as best I can the style and formatting of the original documents. Not sure how I feel about it though. Any feedback? | ||
| + | :Unless we're trying to match a very specific formatting, I actually prefer the default sans serif font. We may want to create a kind of header box to separate the text itself from an intro description, like [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gettysburg_Address Wikisource does]. But I'm fine with whatever. <span style="font-family:Georgia, serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''''[[User:Admin|admin]]''''' • '''''[[User_talk:Admin|talk]]''''' </span> 07:04, 21 September 2009 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::Alright. I'm down with the header idea if you want to take the time sometime to implement it. I'm too dumb. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; vertical-align:5%; font-family: Georgia,serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' • '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' </span> 07:15, 21 September 2009 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:15, 21 September 2009
What do you think of using Category:Source documents (or some subcategory thereof) on all pages in the Source namespace? — admin • talk 13:18, 18 September 2009 (CDT)
- I would even prefer sub-categories, like Category:City of Pensacola ordinances, Category:British West Florida source documents etc. — dscosson • talk 14:41, 18 September 2009 (CDT)
Formatting[edit]
On the ordinances and resolutions I have transcribed thus far, I have employed a monospace font in an effort to duplicate as best I can the style and formatting of the original documents. Not sure how I feel about it though. Any feedback?
- Unless we're trying to match a very specific formatting, I actually prefer the default sans serif font. We may want to create a kind of header box to separate the text itself from an intro description, like Wikisource does. But I'm fine with whatever. — admin • talk 07:04, 21 September 2009 (CDT)
