9,487
edits
Changes
no edit summary
: ''29-July-20007:'' OK, sorry, I was trying to expand the detailed coverage, as preferred by several Wikipedia users who consider ''Pensapedia'' as meager, but I see that's not what's happening here, as I considered "Pensacola overview" as still '''''too limited''''', not too long. My God, it's the subject of the whole wiki, comprendo? (Hello? Do you see what the whole outside world would expect of Pensapedia?) Anyway, I will focus my efforts on Wikipedia Pensacola articles instead: feel free to delete article "[[Pensacola overview]]" and thanks for contacting me before I had expanded/illustrated dozens of articles. Better keep a prepared, canned message to warn others not to formalize/illustrate articles here. Wikipedia has many more people to cover the formalized view of Pensacola. Thanks again for the clarification. Bye. -[[User:Wikid77|Wikid77]] 18:20, 29 July 2007 (CDT)
::Sorry about the confusion. I guess what I meant was, if we were ever going to have an article called [[Pensacola overview]], it would likely be very different than a verbatim copy of the Pensacola article at Wikipedia. As far as "what the whole outside world would expect" to read, I think the Wikipedia is much more appropriate for that kind of audience. Our scope here is much more local and probably wouldn't be of much interest to anyone who doesn't live here or have other personal connections. --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 18:35, 29 July 2007 (CDT)