Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pnj.com"

From Pensapedia, the Pensacola encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(May 14 outage)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
*Yeah... That's not what happened, with me, but that's a fair enough premise.  The prose was a bit cumbersome anyway. '''[[User:Dcosson|dcosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 10:28, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
 
*Yeah... That's not what happened, with me, but that's a fair enough premise.  The prose was a bit cumbersome anyway. '''[[User:Dcosson|dcosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 10:28, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
 
::I'm still getting the Network Solutions splash page, so who knows? In any event, posterity will likely only be interested (if at all) in the fact that the non-renewal occured — not the exact time that it was resolved. --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 10:41, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
 
::I'm still getting the Network Solutions splash page, so who knows? In any event, posterity will likely only be interested (if at all) in the fact that the non-renewal occured — not the exact time that it was resolved. --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 10:41, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
 +
:::Yeah, I'm getting it now, too.  I was just saying that I didn't get it from cache or anything.  I know my interwebs.  It doesn't matter, you're right, times and even brief fixes are not really important.  '''[[User:Dcosson|dcosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 11:30, 14 May 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 16:30, 14 May 2007

May 14 outage[edit]

DNS propagation is notoriously capricious and subjective; your computer or ISP may have cached the pnj.com nameservers, which may be why it blipped back for a moment. Since others may not have experienced the same thing, I'd say let's wait till it comes back for good.--Admin 09:58, 14 May 2007 (CDT)

  • Yeah... That's not what happened, with me, but that's a fair enough premise. The prose was a bit cumbersome anyway. dcosson ··· talk 10:28, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
I'm still getting the Network Solutions splash page, so who knows? In any event, posterity will likely only be interested (if at all) in the fact that the non-renewal occured — not the exact time that it was resolved. --Admin 10:41, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
Yeah, I'm getting it now, too. I was just saying that I didn't get it from cache or anything. I know my interwebs. It doesn't matter, you're right, times and even brief fixes are not really important. dcosson ··· talk 11:30, 14 May 2007 (CDT)