Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pnj.com"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==May 14 outage== | ||
DNS propagation is notoriously capricious and subjective; your computer or ISP may have cached the pnj.com nameservers, which may be why it blipped back for a moment. Since others may not have experienced the same thing, I'd say let's wait till it comes back for good.--[[User:Admin|Admin]] 09:58, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | DNS propagation is notoriously capricious and subjective; your computer or ISP may have cached the pnj.com nameservers, which may be why it blipped back for a moment. Since others may not have experienced the same thing, I'd say let's wait till it comes back for good.--[[User:Admin|Admin]] 09:58, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
*Yeah... That's not what happened, with me, but that's a fair enough premise. The prose was a bit cumbersome anyway. '''[[User:Dcosson|dcosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 10:28, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | *Yeah... That's not what happened, with me, but that's a fair enough premise. The prose was a bit cumbersome anyway. '''[[User:Dcosson|dcosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 10:28, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::I'm still getting the Network Solutions splash page, so who knows? In any event, posterity will likely only be interested (if at all) in the fact that the non-renewal occured — not the exact time that it was resolved. --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 10:41, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:41, 14 May 2007
May 14 outage
DNS propagation is notoriously capricious and subjective; your computer or ISP may have cached the pnj.com nameservers, which may be why it blipped back for a moment. Since others may not have experienced the same thing, I'd say let's wait till it comes back for good.--Admin 09:58, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
- Yeah... That's not what happened, with me, but that's a fair enough premise. The prose was a bit cumbersome anyway. dcosson ··· talk 10:28, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
- I'm still getting the Network Solutions splash page, so who knows? In any event, posterity will likely only be interested (if at all) in the fact that the non-renewal occured — not the exact time that it was resolved. --Admin 10:41, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
