Difference between revisions of "Pensapedia talk:Source namespace"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What do you think of using [[:Category:Source documents]] (or some subcategory thereof) on all pages in the Source namespace? <span style="font-family:Georgia, serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''''[[User:Admin|admin]]''''' • '''''[[User_talk:Admin|talk]]''''' </span> 13:18, 18 September 2009 (CDT) | What do you think of using [[:Category:Source documents]] (or some subcategory thereof) on all pages in the Source namespace? <span style="font-family:Georgia, serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''''[[User:Admin|admin]]''''' • '''''[[User_talk:Admin|talk]]''''' </span> 13:18, 18 September 2009 (CDT) | ||
| − | + | :I would even prefer sub-categories, like [[:Category:City of Pensacola ordinances]], [[:Category:British West Florida source documents]] etc. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; vertical-align:5%; font-family: Georgia,serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' • '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' </span> 14:41, 18 September 2009 (CDT) | |
| + | ::Right, definitely. But just as a main depository to hold all the other subcategories, does "Category:Source documents" work? <span style="font-family:Georgia, serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''''[[User:Admin|admin]]''''' • '''''[[User_talk:Admin|talk]]''''' </span> 15:57, 18 September 2009 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:57, 18 September 2009
What do you think of using Category:Source documents (or some subcategory thereof) on all pages in the Source namespace? — admin • talk 13:18, 18 September 2009 (CDT)
- I would even prefer sub-categories, like Category:City of Pensacola ordinances, Category:British West Florida source documents etc. — dscosson • talk 14:41, 18 September 2009 (CDT)
