Difference between revisions of "Talk:Escambia County elections, 2008"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Very nicely done! --~~~~) |
m |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Very nicely done! --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 07:09, 16 February 2008 (CST) | Very nicely done! --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 07:09, 16 February 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Party designations== | ||
| + | Great work on these articles, but at first glance the "REP" and "DEM" tags look like wikilinks because of their colors. What would you think about something like this instead? | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="background:#ff6666; color:white" | '''REP''' | ||
| + | | [[Ron McNesby]] '''(i)''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="background:#ff6666; color:white" | '''REP''' | ||
| + | | [[David Morgan]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="background:#6666ff; color:white" | '''DEM''' | ||
| + | |[[Sam Lucas|Samuel E. Lucas]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="background:#6666ff; color:white" | '''DEM''' | ||
| + | |[[Larry Scapecchi]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 07:06, 23 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :WFM. '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 09:40, 23 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::Actually, I prefer darker colours... as below. Do you care? '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 09:42, 23 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::{| class="wikitable" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="background:red; color:white" | '''REP''' | ||
| + | | [[Ron McNesby]] '''(i)''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="background:red; color:white" | '''REP''' | ||
| + | | [[David Morgan]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="background:blue; color:white" | '''DEM''' | ||
| + | |[[Sam Lucas|Samuel E. Lucas]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="background:blue; color:white" | '''DEM''' | ||
| + | |[[Larry Scapecchi]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | :::My druthers would be something with a little less emphasis on the party — see one more idea below — but I don't feel strongly about it. --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 15:19, 23 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::{| class="wikitable" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! style="border: 2px solid red; background:#ffcccc; font-size: x-small" | '''REP''' | ||
| + | | [[Ron McNesby]] '''(i)''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! style="border: 2px solid red; background:#ffcccc; font-size: x-small" | '''REP''' | ||
| + | | [[David Morgan]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! style="border: 2px solid blue; background: #ccccff; font-size: x-small" | '''DEM''' | ||
| + | |[[Sam Lucas|Samuel E. Lucas]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! style="border: 2px solid blue; background: #ccccff; font-size: x-small" | '''DEM''' | ||
| + | |[[Larry Scapecchi]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | ::::Not wild about the borders... I will think upon it... If I may ask, is there a particular reason who you to lessen the emphasis on the party? '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 17:28, 23 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::::Not really, just an aesthetic thing I guess. The Monobook theme for Mediawiki is so neutral that any bold color immediately draws the eye and makes the actual content (in this case, the candidates' names) look secondary. My thinking is, if it's not clickable, it should be subdued. Call it graphic designer OCD. :) --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 23:18, 23 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::::::If low-key is your goal, how is this? '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 10:19, 24 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::::::{| class="wikitable" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;" | <span style="font-size: small; color: red;">●</span>'''REP''' | ||
| + | | Gop McRepublicanson '''(i)''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;" | <span style="font-size: small; color: blue;">●</span>'''DEM''' | ||
| + | | Libero McDemocrat | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;" | <span style="font-size: small; color: #000;">●</span>'''NPA''' | ||
| + | | Spineless McNoparty | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | :::::::Looks great! Thanks for bearing with me. (If it helps, I don't think the "text-align: center" is necessary for "!" table cells.) --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 10:40, 24 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:42, 24 April 2008
Very nicely done! --Admin 07:09, 16 February 2008 (CST)
Party designations[edit]
Great work on these articles, but at first glance the "REP" and "DEM" tags look like wikilinks because of their colors. What would you think about something like this instead?
| REP | Ron McNesby (i) |
| REP | David Morgan |
| DEM | Samuel E. Lucas |
| DEM | Larry Scapecchi |
--Admin 07:06, 23 April 2008 (CDT)
REP Ron McNesby (i) REP David Morgan DEM Samuel E. Lucas DEM Larry Scapecchi
- My druthers would be something with a little less emphasis on the party — see one more idea below — but I don't feel strongly about it. --Admin 15:19, 23 April 2008 (CDT)
REP Ron McNesby (i) REP David Morgan DEM Samuel E. Lucas DEM Larry Scapecchi
- Not wild about the borders... I will think upon it... If I may ask, is there a particular reason who you to lessen the emphasis on the party? dscosson ··· talk 17:28, 23 April 2008 (CDT)
- Not really, just an aesthetic thing I guess. The Monobook theme for Mediawiki is so neutral that any bold color immediately draws the eye and makes the actual content (in this case, the candidates' names) look secondary. My thinking is, if it's not clickable, it should be subdued. Call it graphic designer OCD. :) --Admin 23:18, 23 April 2008 (CDT)
- Not wild about the borders... I will think upon it... If I may ask, is there a particular reason who you to lessen the emphasis on the party? dscosson ··· talk 17:28, 23 April 2008 (CDT)
●REP Gop McRepublicanson (i) ●DEM Libero McDemocrat ●NPA Spineless McNoparty
- Looks great! Thanks for bearing with me. (If it helps, I don't think the "text-align: center" is necessary for "!" table cells.) --Admin 10:40, 24 April 2008 (CDT)
